Summary:
A husband cannot claim פרעתי, even in a situation where the woman admits that she has the גט and כתובה, but is not prepared to release it to the husband (which may cause a loss to the husband), since ר' יוחנן maintains כותבין שובר.
She brought out her Get [but without the K’suboh]; she collects her K’suboh - הוציאה גט [ואין עמו כתובה] גובה כתובתה
Summary:
A woman who claims in the presence of her husband that she is divorced, and the husband claims he did not divorce her, he is not liable for שאר כסות ועונה for it is like טענו חטים והודה לא בשעורים where he is פטור אפילו מדמי שעורים.
A woman who claims in the presence of her husband גרשתני, if she is asking permission to remarry, she is believed, if however she is requesting her כתובה she is not believed.
How will a widow after betrothal collect - אלמנה מן האירוסין במאי גביא
Summary:
Even if one disagrees with ר"י, it is understood that במקום שאין כותבין כתובה, one is not believed with a claim of פרעתי on a כתובה. The proof from אלמנה מן האירוסין is why were the חכמים not מתקן to write a כתובה for an ארוסה.
How does he know that she has a K’suboh from betrothal - מן האירוסין מנא ליה דאית לה כתובה
Summary:
We know from the אמוראים that there is a כתובה מן האירוסין (but not from the תנאים). Alternately all agree that there is כתובה מן האירוסין by a גרושה, but we have no proof that an אלמנה as well can collect.
