And in the dispute of Rabi Yochonon and Reish Lokish - ובפלוגתא דרבי יוחנן וריש לקיש
Summary:
כפרות are מחלקות according to everyone, so there is a possibility of bringing two חטאות, if he brought a חטאת on one שוגג before he became aware of the other שוגג.
However, a live person carries himself - אבל אדם חי נושא את עצמו
Summary:
The רבנן maintain that by animals and very young infants we do not say החי נושא את עצמו, however by older children and certainly adults we do say החי נושא את עצמו
Summary:
The horses are designated to carry birds of prey but not tied up captured birds, for by כפות even ר' נתן agrees that they are not נושא את עצמו.
For a corpse in a bed, he is liable - את המת במטה חייב
Summary:
We know that ר"י maintains משאצל"ג is חייב either from our משנה, where the ת"ק is presumably ר"י (as he was in the previous משנה), or from the משנה regarding ע"ז.
Summary:
According to רש"י a משאצל"ג is one where he would rather not have to do it. According to תוספות it is a מלאכה which is not done for the same purpose as it was done in the משכן. [Only by מקלקלין (ע"מ לתקן) do we require that it should be לגופו ולגופה (but not by הוצאה).]
